CU Boulder School of Education Reauthorization Self-Study

School of Education students at graduation

As the flagship university of the state of Colorado, CU Boulder is a dynamic community of scholars and learners. As one of the 36 U.S public research institutions belonging to the Association of American Universities, we have a proud tradition of academic excellence.

 

Over

36,000 students

enrolled at CU Boulder in fall 2022, the largest campus in the University of Colorado system

CU Boulder has a 

18:1 student to faculty ratio

for undergraduate students

Approximately

56 % Colorado residents

among students in fall 2022

 

School of Education logo

 

Our Mission and Vision

The School of Education is grounded in a lived commitment to democracy, diversity, equity, and justice. The work of our faculty, researchers, staff, and students contributes to evidence-based policy and practice. Our graduates are courageous leaders who challenge, inspire, educate, and work toward a more just and humane world.

Our initial teacher licensure and endorsement programs aim to prepare reflective, ethical, anti-racist, and inclusive educators through engaged work in K-12 classrooms, nonprofit organizations, and related educational endeavors. Our programs are designed to address the teacher shortage, and specific needs of the state, including the need for high-quality, equity-oriented teachers for high-needs content areas, such as STEM, and teachers prepared to teach culturally and linguistically diverse students.

 

Around

390 teacher licensure students

enrolled in the School of Education in fall 2022

Approximately

22 % students of color

among teacher licensure programs at the School of Education in fall 2022

Approximately

87 % are women

among teacher licensure programs at the School of Education in fall 2022

Among licensure and endorsement candidates, nearly

67 % study Elementary Education

with the K-6 Elementary initial licensure and endorsement in K-12 Culturally & Linguistically Diverse Education

Among all School of Education students (undergraduate and graduate), over 

63 % pursue teacher licensure

or teacher added endorsements in fall 2022

Of all licensure candidates in fall 2022, around

90 % are undergraduates

pursuing a BA degree with their initial licensure

Enrollment data for Fall 2022 is available online at CU Boulder Fall Enrollment (select Education under College/Division and then you can select by Major).

How does the school’s equity and justice mission show up in your CU Boulder program and your work as a teacher candidate?

  I have always been very impressed with the School of Education's devotion to equity and justice specially, and it's probably the main reason that I chose to earn my teaching license from CU Boulder."

—Emma Hoeschler, Secondary Social Studies Teacher Licensure Student

 

1. Build enrollment, especially among first-generation, low-income, non-traditional, bilingual, and underrepresented BIPOC students

to better reflect the K-12 students and communities with whom we partner and support: by building relationships with other units on campus, developing clusters of courses for specific majors, and partnering with local school districts.

 

2. Strengthen and further integrate school and community partnerships

within our programs: deepen K-12, nonprofit, government and industry partnerships; work with career services on integration; develop structures for oversight.

 

3. Increase and stabilize funding:

work with CU, donors, the state, and districts to increase funding opportunities.

 

4. Evaluate and revise our programs to be more accessible and equitable:

revise agreements with community colleges; develop pipelines for underrepresented and non- traditional students; increase flexibility in course offerings.

Best Practices Report: Goals and Progress 

As part of a team of teacher educators across all licensure programs at the University of Colorado Boulder, we submitted the Best Practices Report to the state in March of 2020, which allowed us the opportunity to do a self-assessment in relation to the guiding principles. We selected three professional learning goals that we have worked toward over three academic years (Fall 2020-Spring 2023). These goals were selected following rich, collaborative conversation around aims that are central to all our programs and help define what it means for a candidate to complete a CU Boulder teacher licensure program.

 

Principle 2. Teacher preparation programs foster candidates’ deep understanding of P-12 learners, including their cognitive and socio-emotional development.

Practice 2a. Curricula build candidates’ skills to foster inclusive, safe, and supportive learning environments that enable each learner to meet high standards.

  • Progress of professional plan: ​​Faculty in CU Humanities developed an assessment component called the Practices in Process (PIP) project (discussed in Domain I) that candidates across all secondary programs complete during their student teaching experience. This includes specific prompts in reflection assignments that ask candidates to make claims about their teaching and provide evidence supporting their claims around fostering a safe and inclusive learning environment. Faculty developed lesson planning templates aligned with their equity framework that includes explicit support in helping students name their efforts toward inclusive practices that allow all ideas to be heard and create safe spaces for students. Faculty developed specific prompts in reflection assignments, such as the PIP capstone, that ask students to make claims about their teaching and provide evidence supporting their claims around fostering a safe and inclusive learning environment.
  • Where we are headed next: CU Teach faculty will use this year to collect feedback from teacher candidates, mentor teachers, and instructors to make necessary changes to our assessments.

Principle 3. Teacher preparation programs provide intentional, coherent, and extensive clinical experiences for candidates.

Practice 3b. Curricula complement and align with clinical experiences, so candidates develop their knowledge and skills in meaningful ways.

  • Progress of professional plan: ​​We have developed the role of Field Coaches (detailed in Domain III), who are largely responsible for mediating teacher candidates’ field-based learning. We have designed Field Coach structures that offer mentoring by veteran teacher educators in the School of Education and the ability to work closely with program faculty in relation to specific courses so that their field-based mediation is more tightly linked to program goals. We designed and launched a CU Humanities course sequence (EDUC 1001, 2001, and 3001). Detailed in Domain I, this sequence centers on defining teaching for equity and justice, naming our individual identities and positionalities, and considering how these identities and positionalities shape our learning to become teachers in both the university and public school classroom settings.
  • Where we are headed next: We are working to develop more consistent support for mentor teachers across our partnership schools. Field Coaches and teacher education faculty will contribute to this work, which will aim to cultivate learning for all stakeholders. Specifically, one goal is to support cooperating teachers’ learning about university coursework, principles, and frameworks, while drawing on mentor teacher knowledge and expertise that we incorporate into courses and other program features.

Principle 3. Teacher preparation programs provide intentional, coherent, and extensive clinical experiences for candidates.

Practice 3d. Partnerships for clinical experiences are mutually beneficial for teacher candidates, P-12 educators, and schools.

  • Progress of professional plan: ​​In elementary education, we designed year-long placements for all elementary education Year 3 and Year 4 teacher candidates. Moving to a year-long placement design supports teacher candidates to know the elementary learners in their placement classrooms more deeply, thereby enabling them to facilitate student learning more effectively, better support their mentor teachers, and participate more fully in the school community. We are cultivating more horizontal relationships by supporting Field Coaches to work as “brokers” across school and university settings, establishing structures that enable all stakeholders to learn from one another and set collaborative goals relative to teacher candidate learning. In music, we built upon the success of the existing Music Mentor Plus program, developed by CU faculty Rickels and Berg (2018), and began the mentoring program in the Boulder Valley School District. We have since expanded to the Jeffco School District and are continuing mentor support by offering clinics and virtual workshops with directors throughout the Denver Metro region.
  • Where we are headed next: We are further developing teacher candidate and mentor supports to ensure mutually beneficial, high-quality experiences in these partnerships. In music, we hope to continue to offer the program to mentors by partnering with additional school district professional development divisions.

Teacher education learning outcomes

  1. Demonstrate pedagogical expertise in the disciplines they teach;
  2. Establish a safe and inclusive classroom community that reflects a dynamic understanding of culture;
  3. Design lessons that emphasize the importance of critical, collaborative sense-making and diverse perspectives;
  4. Strive toward teaching and learning environments that center students’ knowledge and experiences and challenges deficit and neutral perspectives;
  5. Lead learning communities that emphasize dignity and respect through a focus on disciplinary learning;
  6. Demonstrate professional integrity through ethical conduct, reflection and leadership;
  7. Foster relationships with students, families, communities and colleagues to advocate for equity and justice.

 

Teacher Licensure pathways

CU Teach

An innovative, nationally renowned secondary math and science teacher education program that provides STEM majors at the undergraduate, post-baccalaureate and master's levels a pathway for obtaining a Colorado teaching licensure.

  • Middle school mathematics (undergraduate, post-baccalaureate)
  • Secondary mathematics (undergraduate, post-baccalaureate, master's plus)
  • Secondary science (undergraduate, post-baccalaureate, master's plus)
  • With the hiring of new CU Teach faculty in 2021, the program has worked closely with a number of stakeholders involved with CU Teach to develop an updated pedagogical framework that outlines what candidates should know, be able to do, and who they will be by the completion of our program. In terms of what candidates should know, the framework outlines theories of learning, the histories of STEM and STEM education, disciplinary and pedagogical content knowledge, national and regional standards, and the influence of constructs like power and identity in shaping learning environments.
  • We have also co-developed an equity framework focused on supporting licensure candidates in becoming reflective practitioners who actively engage in understanding and pushing back against oppressive systems. The equity framework focuses on three interconnected themes: 1) Power, Privilege, and Positioning; 2) Culture, Diversity, and Community; and 3) Agency and Change. Both the equity and pedagogical frameworks reflect the historical values and approaches of the CU Teach program, alongside an effort to more intentionally weave and make explicit issues of educational equity, justice, and diversity within our courses. The frameworks also incorporate recent knowledge about effective and equity-oriented STEM pedagogies. 

CU Humanities

The CU Humanities programs are deeply committed to fostering candidates’ understanding of content knowledge, general pedagogical knowledge, and pedagogical content knowledge.

  • Secondary English language arts (undergraduate, post-baccalaureate, master's plus)
  • Secondary social studies (undergraduate, post-baccalaureate, master's plus)
  • World languages (undergraduate, post-baccalaureate)
    • French, German, Latin, Japanese, Spanish 
  • The CU Humanities team made a deliberate decision to organize the CU Humanities licensure program around our shared commitment to advancing equity and justice in schools. To that end, the program is organized around an equity framework and guiding questions centered on power, privilege, and positioning; culture and diversity; and agency and change. The equity framework and guiding questions were and continue to be used to design the program relative to courses, field experiences, and the development of particular skills and stances.
Music Education

Licensure candidates who graduate from the music education program and enter the teaching field are responsible for nurturing and developing the next generation of music performers, music teachers, and music appreciators/consumers. 

  • K-12 music education (undergraduate, post-baccalaureate)
  • Because of the varying demands and opportunities in teaching music in K-12 school contexts, the Undergraduate music education curriculum strikes a balance between specialization and generalization. BME students must demonstrate a sufficiently broad knowledge of the entire music program, but also possess the specialized skills necessary to be a successful general music, choir, orchestra, or band instructor.
Elementary Education

With the endorsement in Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Education (CLD), the Elementary Education program is a four-year undergraduate major designed to address the growing need in Colorado and across the country for teachers who are prepared to teach emerging bilingual students. 

  • K-6 elementary education (undergraduate)
  • K-12 culturally & linguistically diverse education (undergraduate)
  • Starting in 2018, the Elementary Education faculty, representing faculty from all the program areas in the School of Education (with the exception of Research and Evaluation Methodology), spent several months reimagining the Elementary Education’s framework in the form of six intertwined program principles: 1) Engaging in humanizing, anti-racist pedagogies; 2) Taking a critically conscious stance; 3) Embracing a holistic view of bilingualism; 4) Holding a dynamic view of culture; 5) Designing curriculum and instruction, and enact teaching practices, grounded in deep knowledge of learners and in research about anti-racist, justice-centered learning; and 6) Viewing themselves as agents of change, who advocate on behalf of and in solidarity with minoritized learners, and their families. The program Scope and Sequence document outlines the progression of course and fieldwork and includes a detailed description of each of the program’s principles.
  • Courses are designed to align with the Elementary Education Program Principles, the Colorado Teacher Quality Standards, and the Colorado Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Educator Standards. Candidates engage explicitly with the principles in course readings, activities, assignments, and fieldwork. All coursework reflects the most up-to-date content and pedagogical standards and is updated frequently to address the growing research base in elementary education. A unique and important part of our program is the way in which we strive to be a professional learning community of faculty, learning together about contemporary research in equity-minded and anti-racist teacher education.
Teacher Added Endorsement Program Areas and Levels
  • K-12 Culturally & Linguistically Diverse Education (master's)
  • K-12 Culturally & Linguistically Diverse Bilingual Education Specialist (master's)
  • K-12 Culturally & Linguistically Diverse Education and 5-21 Special Educationl Generalist (master's)
  • Reading Teacher (master's)
  • The University of Colorado Master’s program in Educational Equity and Cultural Diversity (EECD) is housed in the School of Education on the Boulder Campus and requires candidates to complete a minimum of 31 credit hours. Three MA tracks are offered: 1) Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Education (CLD) with qualification for a Colorado teaching endorsement as a general CLD specialist (K-12) or as a CLD specialist (K-12) in Bilingual Education; 2) Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Education/Special Education Generalist with qualification for teaching endorsements in both CLD (K-12) and Special Education Generalist (ages 5-21); 3) An interdisciplinary MA focused on Social/Multicultural/Bilingual Education with no license endorsement.

  • Embedded in the Master’s program are pathways for Colorado teaching license endorsements. Students seeking the EECD MA with an endorsement must have completed an Elementary, Secondary, or K-12 teaching license. The EECD MA program offers a course of study devoted to the critical examination of theory, practice, and policy in two major areas of emphasis, including: (1) the education of culturally and linguistically diverse students and (2) the education of students with learning disabilities. The program stresses the analysis, evaluation, and implementation of educational programs for students who represent diverse learning needs within the public school system. School culture, language policies, and the social and political context of schooling are examined across emphases. This program examines policies that influence the assessment, placement, and services provided for students with learning disabilities. Our programs emphasize advocacy and respect for culture and language and provide the opportunity for educational accountability.

  • As described in the CU Boulder Catalog Information, the Literacy Education track is one of four tracks in the MA in Curriculum & Instruction (EDCI) master’s degree. This track is designed to support teachers who are interested in developing greater understanding and expertise in the teaching and learning of literacy.

Colorado map of teacher shortages
Our initial teacher licensure and endorsement programs strive to address the teaching and learning needs in Colorado by preparing candidates in content areas and specializations that have the greatest shortages in Colorado. As highlighted in the shortage dashboard and the Educator Preparation Report, “one of the factors exacerbating teacher shortages is attrition among novice teachers” (2021, p.16). We aim to provide rigorous and robust preparation which is necessary to set novice teachers up for success as they transition into their early careers in classrooms. Below, we describe a few examples of how our programs are working to address shortage areas in Science, Math, World Languages (Spanish), Music, and supporting bilingual learners across the state.

 

  • CU Teach has leveraged partnerships with the Colleges of Arts & Sciences and Engineering to both recruit candidates and dismantle barriers to completing our teacher licensure pathway. We have also leveraged faculty from outside the School of Education to design and implement Teaching and Learning courses that fulfill STEM major and licensure requirements.
  • CU Teach faculty engage in extensive recruiting efforts that include distributing promotional materials, presenting in large introductory STEM courses, providing information to advisors, maintaining an informational website, and reaching out to candidates who have expressed an interest in teaching.
  • The introductory Step 1 and Step 2 courses are designed to facilitate STEM majors exploring teaching as a career by providing early opportunities to design and enact lessons founded in our pedagogical framework. 
  • We reorganized our Master’s + Licensure pathway in response to candidate feedback about accessibility. We have condensed the pathway into a 14-month program that starts in the summer and results in candidates being able to find employment the following school year after they begin.
  • The Spanish licensure faculty advisor emails all Spanish majors at CU Boulder to recruit them to the Spanish licensure program. They participate in undergraduate recruitment activities held by the department.
  • There is now a recently approved SPAN MA track, MA in Spanish for Teaching, which gives candidates a broad base in linguistics and literature along with world languages pedagogy.
  • The faculty advisor has been an active member of the State Foreign Language teachers organization and a Board member of the Colorado Chapter of the American Association of Teachers of Spanish and Portuguese. She has participated in efforts for better vertical articulation between secondary and post-secondary institutions, including taking a major role in the creation of a College Hub page on the CCFLT website, for secondary language teachers and students to obtain information about post-secondary language programs in the state, including those offering teaching licensures.
  • Music as a subject area is facing many of the same challenges currently present in all of teacher education. Convincing high schoolers to pursue a career in education can be a tough sell in the current climate with pressures on teachers from the pandemic, low pay, and low status perception by the public. In addition, music is often seen as an area more at risk for budget cuts, leading to a perception that jobs are less secure.
  • To combat this, our faculty work to directly engage local music students and partner with their K-12 music teachers through clinics, workshops, and guest musical collaborations. We also invite high school students annually to participate in our Trying On Teaching Program, where they can work alongside CU music education students in a community outreach program.
  • The Elementary Education program is working to develop a robust cohort of teachers prepared to teach in schools and communities with these significant shortages.
  • In coordination with the BUENO Center for Multicultural Education, the EECD MA program partners with school districts to organize cohorts of in-service teachers to earn an MA and a recommendation to CDE for CLD or CLD and Special Education licensure endorsements. Many of these are among the districts with the highest percentage of bilingual learners; 49% of Adams 14’s students, for example, are bilingual learners. To facilitate teachers’ experiences, we often conduct the classes in their districts, with CU Boulder faculty traveling to the districts. 

The shortage challenges require a multifaceted approach and conversations between stakeholders on local, state, and national levels. The Teacher Shortages Across the Nation and Colorado Report (2017) emphasizes the need for dialogue across groups in the state:

The education of the students of Colorado is a collective responsibility and as a result, requires collective efforts and collaborative solutions. Parents, students, community members, business leaders, teachers, school administrators, school staff members, state elected officials, educational organizations, BOCES, and educator preparation leaders must strategically work together to address this urgent need and increase the recruitment and retention of educators (p.43).

As described in our School of Education context, our community is engaging with partners across the state to address the critical need for well-prepared educators who can support students in today’s classrooms. We are actively participating in conversations across the state and aim to be leaders when able to support this work. For example, in 2020, our Director of Teacher Education at CU Boulder along with colleagues at CU Denver and Metropolitan University launched the Denver Area Clinical Practice Collaborative (DACPC), a regional collaborative between local EPPs and school districts to navigate the ever-changing needs and challenges of COVID-19. Once the group was able to feel stable enough to look beyond the everyday emergencies of the pandemic, the collaborative wished to remain together and build on their collective efforts to more systematically address our state’s most pressing challenges. To guide this work, the DACPC leadership created a set of guiding questions to help our group define a set of priorities and topics for the upcoming year:

  • What do PK-12 students and teachers need the most right now and how might we design clinical experiences to support them (prioritizing student teaching/residencies and then thinking about earlier field experiences)?

  • What could these clinical experiences look like and what might each of us consider to support cooperating teachers and teacher candidates in this context?

  • What potential barriers, constraints, and concerns do we have to keep in mind and problem-solve?

  • How can we work as a regional community of districts and EPPs to develop these designs for both the fall as well as leverage this opportunity to establish ongoing clinical practice innovation longer-term?

With these questions in mind, the DACPC leadership facilitated a series of conversations and activities to identify topics that our community aims to address as a collective in the coming months and years. Some of these priorities overlap with other statewide goals, such as addressing shortage areas. DACPC membership has grown exponentially and CU Boulder looks forward to remaining an engaged partner and leader in these conversations. 

CU Boulder also continues to engage in other statewide efforts. For instance, we are serving as a member of the CDE/R12 Strengthening the Workforce Pipeline Working Groups. The group, composed of local “teams,” meets regularly to look at state-level data and develop recommendations for the state working groups to support a stronger workforce pipeline.

 

 

Candidate Thresholds & Developmental Benchmarks

 

Grades

  • Undergraduate and Post-Baccalaureate candidates must maintain a grade point average of 2.00 or better in their teacher licensure courses after being admitted into our teacher licensure programs. Master’s + Licensure candidates must maintain a grade point average of 3.00 or better.
  • K-6 Elementary Education candidates must earn a final grade of at least a B 2.7) or higher in the Professional Sequence courses within the major. These courses must be repeated if the student fails to earn the grade required.
  • K-12, 6-8 Middle School, and 7-12 Secondary Teacher Licensure candidates must earn a final grade of at least a B- (2.7) or higher in the licensure coursework which requires formal admission into a Teacher Licensure program. These courses must be repeated if the student fails to earn the grade required.
  • K-6 Elementary Education BA, K-12, 6-8 Middle School, and 7-12 Secondary Teacher Licensure candidates must earn a final grade of at least a C- (1.7) or higher in all content and liberal arts coursework that is applied towards licensure.

 

Student Code of Conduct

Candidates must meet the professional standards laid out in our Student Code of Conduct in the areas of responsibility, learning expectations, stance, and collegiality. Because we are preparing future educators, it is imperative that we monitor progress, provide support, and coaching for candidates to be successful and recommended for licensure. Students not meeting course or professional standards are supported by the Office of Advising, the Teacher Education Leadership Team, and the Associate Dean of Students as needed. When necessary, we assist students who are unable to meet standards to find another pathway at CU.

 

Demonstrated mastery of required standards in education coursework

Candidates demonstrate mastery in courses through mapped assignments connected to track the measurement of each program’s standards, which include content standards, program principles and frameworks, The Colorado Teacher Quality Standards, and the Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Education Standards (when relevant). Each licensure program uses an assessment matrix identifying how key assignments and learning experiences in courses build a comprehensive picture of our teacher candidates' growth over time.

 

Demonstrated mastery of required standards in education fieldwork

Programs use a combination of formative and cumulative assessments during a candidate’s field experiences to evaluate progress needed to move into the next phase of licensure or, in the case of student teaching, to be recommended for licensure. These assessments are conducted by multiple stakeholders for a more comprehensive view of teacher candidate progress (e.g., Field Coaches and mentor teachers weighing in on these assessments over time). Mentors, teacher candidates, and their supervisors meet to discuss the candidates’ progress in a midterm and final “triad” meeting. They draw upon a rubric or survey of student teacher progress towards Colorado Teacher Quality Standards and in the case of Elementary Education, program principles, Cultural and Linguistic Diversity + CO K-6 licensure standards. For examples, please reference the Evaluation Rubric used in all Secondary Licensure programs and the Elementary Education Student Teaching Tool. Teacher licensure candidates also receive formative observations and related feedback during their student teaching experience. The feedback is driven by the candidate's professional learning goals and feedback from Mentor Teachers, University Supervisors, and Field Coaches.

 

Content Exams

All candidates must pass the appropriate content exam for the endorsement they are seeking in order to be recommended for licensure as required by the state, also demonstrating mastery of content. Candidates must satisfy this requirement before student teaching unless they petition to take it on a different schedule due to extenuating circumstances.

 

Capstone Projects

Capstone projects are another important endeavor for candidates to demonstrate readiness and proficiency. For example, Elementary Education candidates engage in a community asset mapping inquiry project in the fall of student teaching and a practitioner inquiry project examining a problem of their own practice during the Spring of student teaching. Secondary candidates engage in the “Practices in Process” (PIP) Assessments.

 

 

Our students are at the center of all that we do, and our reimagined spaces will ensure that we are supporting their opportunities to learn and become leaders in their field.

The CU Boulder School of Education has moved into a new building on campus, the Fleming building. With significant support from the university and fundraising, we have begun the second phase of the renovation and will move into the new office and classroom spaces in early 2023. With our new building, we will be able to bring all our centers into one building and provide more classroom space, as well as space for collaboration and meetings. The building has already made a difference in how we work together and the teaching, learning, and research opportunities we can provide to our licensure candidates.

How does CU Boulder benefit your learning experience and preparation to teach?

  I think that CU Boulder is really preparing its students for a classroom of tomorrow—a future classroom where we’re being critical and looking at things that are relevant to our students, and in a way that we as teachers can also enjoy it."

—Maia Parkin, current Teacher Licensure student, Secondary Humanities

Content Knowledge, Knowledge of Pedagogy & Pedagogical Content Knowledge

Across all of our initial teacher licensure and teacher added endorsement programs, we share a deep commitment to fostering candidates’ understanding of content knowledge, content knowledge for teaching, and general pedagogical knowledge.

Our candidates enter our programs with different academic backgrounds, and areas of expertise and comfort in their knowledge. To support the candidate’s development, the coursework, assignments, materials, and requirements are designed to ensure our candidates have the understanding of content knowledge, content knowledge for teaching, and general pedagogical knowledge to provide standards-based, and linguistically, culturally, and academically appropriate instruction.

 

Content Knowledge
  • Content Major Coursework (Secondary and K-12)
  • Ancillary Content Coursework
  • Content Area Requirement Coursework (Elementary)
  • Licensure Exam
  • Oral Proficiency Interview (Spanish)
Knowledge of Pedagogy
  • Education Coursework and Assignments
  • Connected Field Experiences
Pedagogical Content Knowledge
  • Education Coursework and Assignments
  • Specific Methods Coursework
  • Connected Field Experiences
  • Alignment to Colorado Standards
  • Alignment to National and Professional Standards

Content and Pedagogical Knowledge in Literacy

The Elementary Education program literacy coursework:

  • Introduces and solidifies literacy content and pedagogical knowledge in the Colorado Elementary 4.02 standards, including those in READ Act teacher training expectations
  • Develops foundational content knowledge of language and literacy development, connecting this information with the pedagogical knowledge and evidence-based instruction in field experience settings
  • Support the development of candidates with a solid understanding of the Science of Reading and the Science of Teaching Reading

The Reading Teacher program literacy coursework engages candidates in:

  • Literacy Content Knowledge: reading, discussing, and analyzing the research and theories behind literacy development in order to develop a solid knowledge base about the Science of Reading and sociocultural approaches to literacy and learning, in the lives of students in grades K-12.
  • Knowledge of Pedagogy: Planning, demonstrating, and reflecting on the implementation of these practices and adoption of tools, in the context of their classroom instruction, or supervised tutoring. Courses provide an overview of the features of explicit and systematic instruction, and the gradual release of responsibility, within a multi-tiered framework to support students with different needs.
  • Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Students apply content knowledge to understand and critically evaluation of instructional practices, texts, assessments, and digital tools that support all skills and strategies for fluent reading (as theorized in Scarborough’s rope model and the Simple View of Reading), as well as writing and composition.

 

 

Elise Volpi

  My time in the education program at CU prepared me tremendously for my role as a teacher. My student teaching semester immersed me in the teacher role that helped give me real experience to eventually teach on my own. It also prepared me for teacher interviews because I could speak from experience in the classroom.

My advisor carefully placed me at a school where I would be valued and supported. My mentor teacher allowed me to take the lead in the classroom many times where I was able to practice teaching strategies in a safe space. I turned to my mentor teacher for advice in many situations. For example—how to communicate with student’s parents, how to put students into groups, how to differentiate for students, etc.

Continuing my education as a graduate student, I was able to dive deeper into my craft as a teacher. The specialized classes in the literacy program helped me feel equipped to effectively teach young students how to read. I was able to adopt these practices in my classroom right away and notice the effect they had on students. I learned a lot during my first year of grad school in the Partners in Education (PIE) program. Being with peers that were going through similar first year of teaching struggles was helpful so that we could discuss and brainstorm with each other and our professors on how to move forward.

I am grateful for the preparation that the School of Education provided me through their classes, practicum placements, and experienced staff. I feel now that I have a strong foundation in teaching principles and I am continually passionate about my work!"

—Elise Volpi, Elementary Education alumnus '17 and master's in Curriculum & Instruction, Literacy Studies alumnus '21

 

 

Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Academic Standards

Our commitments to diversity, equity and inclusion are at the heart of our programs and are the foundation of each program’s curriculum.

  • In our initial teacher licensure programs, the program principles and frameworks are central guides, informing how candidates experience and engage with content pedagogy.
  • In our teacher added endorsement programs, the entirety of the EECD MA program – which houses the CLD, CLD-Bilingual Education Specialist, and Special Education Generalist endorsements – is dedicated to preparing teachers to meet the needs of linguistically and culturally diverse students with a variety of learning profiles.
  • The Reading Teacher Endorsement’s course contents draw from the body of knowledge in literacy theories that situate reading, writing, and communication practices in social contexts, which sustain the repertoires of multilingual, multidialectal, multimodal, and digital practices in diverse families and communities.

What role did the intersection between your science and education coursework play in your experience in the CU Boulder program?

  In the secondary science teaching licensure, I had to take actual science courses as well as learn about how to teach science. I think that really structured how I was able to learn and how I approached the classes that I was taking."

—Elena DeAndrea, Secondary Science Licensure Alumnus, '21

Field experiences are an essential component of the School of Education’s programs, providing candidates with opportunities to make important connections to and practice approaches learned in courses. In partnership with school districts, we work to provide intentional, coherent, and extensive clinical experiences for candidates and to foster a partnership of shared leadership and learning with mentors and their administrators.

Candidates have consistent opportunities to be active contributors in their field experiences from the very beginning with their participation evolving and increasing over time. Each licensure program structures candidates’ field experiences slightly differently given required coursework and programmatic aims (as described in Domain I), with each program also working collaboratively to provide extensive opportunities for candidates to learn about, explore, and engage with methods and practices of teaching and learning in their discipline(s) and licensure area. 

We aim to partner with schools with a larger percentage of racially and linguistically diverse students whenever possible, as illustrated below. Though there is a range of demographics across our partner schools, we abide by our commitments to support teacher candidates in designing and delivering rigorous, responsive instruction for students who tend to be marginalized by schools and society. No matter what the school, our candidates are supported in recognizing and attending to the strengths of all students and their communities. The placement processes for both early field experiences (practicum) and student teaching are intentional, thoughtful, and collaborative endeavors.

 

We are partnering with

64 schools

for field experiences for AY 22-23

On average, our partner schools serve

52 % Hispanic and Latino students

across our partner elementary schools

In the 2022-23 school year, there are

120 student teachers

placed in our partner schools

Our candidates gather between

800 and 1095 hours

of field experience through their teacher licensure programs

Supports

We have a variety of supports developed for maintaining high-quality field experiences for both our candidates and their mentors.

  • Mentors are selected with specific criteria in mind, and candidates are intentionally and thoughtfully matched with mentors through information gathered in our candidate matching surveys, mentor surveys, student teaching applications, and through regular meetings, often once a month, with district Human Resources personnel to gather more details about schools, their current climate of collaboration and leadership, and specific needs for mentor and new teacher supports.
  • We are continually refining support for mentors and working closely with districts that offer a variety of professional learning opportunities for mentor teachers.
  • We maintain various resource materials across licensure programs, including Mentor Teacher Resource Pages and Mentor Modules. These are robust platforms that mentors have access to in addition to other structures that share information and provide support throughout the experience, such as informational sessions, meet and greets, and check-ins.
  • Lastly, faculty and centers in the School of Education are involved in offering timely, relevant professional development for practicing teachers.

We take seriously the need to offer ongoing, multifaceted support for teacher candidates in their clinical experiences. Candidates are supported at the site, program, and School of Education levels in each of their field placements over the duration of their licensure program.

  • Across all placements, mentor teachers serve as observers, guides, and critical partners.
  • Staff members and faculty in the Office of Teacher Education support candidates and mentors by providing information, facilitating co-teaching processes and communications and alignment with school and district priorities, and celebrating successes and negotiating concerns as they arise.
  • Course instructors visit classrooms and foster conversation between candidates and mentors across multiple practicum-linked courses, and in our larger Elementary BA program, Practicum Liaisons visit and meet with teams of mentors and candidates.
  • Field Coaches/University Supervisors visit classrooms and foster conversation between candidates and mentors during their culminating semester or year-long student teaching experience.
  • Candidates also receive timely communications, continue to engage with their advisors, and have opportunities to build their network with each other, educators at their school site, and alumni who participate with district partners in our career events.
  • Learning during field experiences is mediated by three major forms of support: 1) guidance/coaching from a more-experienced teacher educator; 2) collective critical colleagueship from peers and a more-experienced teacher educator; and 3) support through tools communicating learning and development benchmarks and accomplishments.

Field-based Course Instructors 

  • Candidates are supported in the field by course instructors in their earlier practicum-linked courses. Course instructors mediate the lesson planning and teaching between courses and practicum placements and may serve as onsite support and visit the candidates’ classrooms. 

University Supervisors

  • A University Supervisor serves as the main field support for candidates and their mentor teachers in semester-long student teaching experiences. Supervisors work one-on-one with a small cohort of student teachers, provide coaching through observations and feedback cycles, and provide formative and summative evaluations of their candidates’ progress towards licensure. The University Supervisor also teaches the two-credit student teaching seminar (e.g., EDUC 4513). 

Field Coaches

  • The Field Coach works closely with student teachers and their mentors throughout a year-long student teaching experience. Coaches work one-on-one with a small cohort of candidates in field placements at the same or nearby schools, providing coaching through observations and feedback cycles and formative and summative evaluations of their candidates’ progress towards licensure. The coach mediates the field experiences in the field and attends key courses that candidates take to trace and mediate the learning across school and university contexts. 

Practicum Liaisons

  • Practicum Liaisons manage the logistical and organizational dimensions of field experiences, which are critical to the success of field experiences and the maintenance of hard-earned relationships with district and school partners. Practicum Liaisons work with an entire class of candidates for both fall and spring semesters.  

 

 

Field Experiences: Program Summary Tables

These tables feature the field-related courses in each teacher licensure program (versus the full course sequence). They summarize the current minimum requirements for each field-linked course in order for students to meet the state-required 800 field hours, including 600 student teaching hours, for initial teacher licensure programs. Students are encouraged to do more than the minimum to improve the quality of their learning in the field experiences and ensure that they have met the minimum by the end of the program.

Course # and NameMin. Hours
EDUC 2411 Educational Psychology for Elementary SchoolsMinimum Field Log Hours: 30

EDUC 3320 Literacy in the Elementary Classroom

EDUC 3350 Dis/Ability in Contemporary Classroom

EDUC 4535 Assessment for Bilingual Learners

EDUC 4595 Practicum in Bilingual /Multicultural and ELD Education

Minimum Field Log Hours: 100

Total Estimated hours: 119

EDUC 3321 Literacy in the Elementary Classroom 2

EDUC 4205 Elementary Mathematics Theory and Methods

EDUC 4435 Culturally Sustaining Pedagogies for Bilingual Learners

EDUC 4455 Methods of Biliteracy Instruction

Minimum Field Log Hours: 150

Total Estimated hours: 183

EDUC 4035 Family and Community Engagement

EDUC 4331 Elementary Social Studies Methods

EDUC 4215 Elementary Science Theory and Methods

EDUC 4710: Elementary Student Teaching for Cultural and Linguistic Diversity 1

Minimum Field Log Hours: 300

Total Estimated hours: 336

EDUC 4340 Advanced Issues of Assessment, Teaching, and Learning in Reading, Mathematics, and Science

EDUC 4625 Methods of Teaching English Language Development

EDUC 4720: Elementary Student Teaching for Cultural and Linguistic Diversity 2

Minimum Field Log Hours: 400

Total Estimated hours1: 427

Totals

Minimum Field Hours: 980

Total Estimated Field Hours: 1,095+

1This Y4 spring estimated hours includes the first day back for mentor teachers after winter break and concludes the last day of CU classes. Many candidates remain in their placements until the last day of school in their school district, which is often an additional 4 weeks in the field.

These tables feature the field-related courses in each teacher licensure program (versus the full course sequence). They summarize the current minimum requirements for each field-linked course in order for students to meet the state-required 800 field hours, including 600 student teaching hours, for initial teacher licensure programs. Students are encouraged to do more than the minimum to improve the quality of their learning in the field experiences and ensure that they have met the minimum by the end of the program.

Course # and NameMin. Hours
EDUC 1001 Humanities Teaching for Equity: Naming 

EDUC 2001 Framing: Noticing

*52

EDUC 3001 Framing: Negotiating

*52

EDUC 4001 Framing Equity and Justice in the Humanities Classroom

*104

EDUC 4023 Differentiating Instruction in Diverse Secondary Classrooms

10

EDUC 4112 Educational Psychology for Adolescents13-26
EDUC 4345 or 4330 Secondary Methods I (3)104
EDUC 4712 Student Teaching – Secondary600
Totals

800+

*Candidates complete practicum hours in either EDUC 1001, EDUC 2001 and EDUC 3001 OR EDUC 4001, depending upon when they begin the program. Those beginning as freshmen or sophomores complete the practicum hours associated with EDUC 1001, 2001 and 3001; those beginning as juniors complete the practicum hours associated with EDUC 4001.

These tables feature the field-related courses in each teacher licensure program (versus the full course sequence). They summarize the current minimum requirements for each field-linked course in order for students to meet the state-required 800 field hours, including 600 student teaching hours, for initial teacher licensure programs. Students are encouraged to do more than the minimum to improve the quality of their learning in the field experiences and ensure that they have met the minimum by the end of the program.

Course # and NameMin. Hours
EDUC 1001 Humanities Teaching for Equity: Naming 

EDUC 2001 Framing: Noticing

*52

EDUC 3001 Framing: Negotiating

*52

EDUC 4001 Framing Equity and Justice in the Humanities Classroom

*104

EDUC 4023 Differentiating Instruction in Diverse Secondary Classrooms

10

EDUC 4112 Educational Psychology for Adolescents13-26
SPAN 4650, Methods of Teaching Spanish24 “practical service" hours
EDUC 4125 World Language Methods

60 (meant to be 65)

For fall — under discussion.

EDUC 4023 Differentiating Instruction in Diverse Secondary Classrooms

Spring 21: 52 hours

Fall 21 and beyond: in discussion

EDUC 4712 Student Teaching – Secondary675
Totals

904+

*Candidates complete practicum hours in either EDUC 1001, EDUC 2001 and EDUC 3001 OR EDUC 4001, depending upon when they begin the program. Those beginning as freshmen or sophomores complete the practicum hours associated with EDUC 1001, 2001 and 3001; those beginning as juniors complete the practicum hours associated with EDUC 4001.

These tables feature the field-related courses in each teacher licensure program (versus the full course sequence). They summarize the current minimum requirements for each field-linked course in order for students to meet the state-required 800 field hours, including 600 student teaching hours, for initial teacher licensure programs. Students are encouraged to do more than the minimum to improve the quality of their learning in the field experiences and ensure that they have met the minimum by the end of the program.

Course # and NameMin. Hours
EDUC 5001 Framing Equity and Justice in the Humanities Classroom70

EDUC 4901 Student Teaching I

EDUC 5485 Differentiation in the Classroom

210

EDUC 4902 Student Teaching II

600

Totals

890+

These tables feature the field-related courses in each teacher licensure program (versus the full course sequence). They summarize the current minimum requirements for each field-linked course in order for students to meet the state-required 800 field hours, including 600 student teaching hours, for initial teacher licensure programs. Students are encouraged to do more than the minimum to improve the quality of their learning in the field experiences and ensure that they have met the minimum by the end of the program.

Course # and NameMin. Hours
EDUC 2020** (Step 1) /EDUC 2030  (Step 2)15

EDUC 4050 Knowing & Learning

20

EDUC 4060/5060 Classroom Interactions

60

EDUC 4023 Differentiating Instruction in Diverse Secondary Classrooms/5485 Differentiation in the Classroom

52

EDUC 5375 (Math PBI) /EDUC 5385 (Science PBI)

72

EDUC 4712 Student Teaching – Secondary620
Totals

819+

*Master’s Plus prior to Summer 2022
**EDUC 4610 Becoming a Learning Assistant may be substituted for EDUC 2020. There are no field hours associated with EDUC 4610.

These tables feature the field-related courses in each teacher licensure program (versus the full course sequence). They summarize the current minimum requirements for each field-linked course in order for students to meet the state-required 800 field hours, including 600 student teaching hours, for initial teacher licensure programs. Students are encouraged to do more than the minimum to improve the quality of their learning in the field experiences and ensure that they have met the minimum by the end of the program.

Course # and NameMin. Hours
EDUC 5001 Framing Equity and Justice in the STEM Classroom70

EDUC 4901 Student Teaching I

EDUC 5060 Classroom Interactions

210

EDUC 4902 Student Teaching II

EDUC 5385 Problem-Based Instruction      

EDUC 5485 Differentiation in the Classroom

600

EDUC 4902 Student Teaching II42
Totals

918

*Beginning Summer 2022

These tables feature the field-related courses in each teacher licensure program (versus the full course sequence). They summarize the current minimum requirements for each field-linked course in order for students to meet the state-required 800 field hours, including 600 student teaching hours, for initial teacher licensure programs. Students are encouraged to do more than the minimum to improve the quality of their learning in the field experiences and ensure that they have met the minimum by the end of the program.

Course # and NameMin. Hours
MUSC 2103 Introduction to Music Education25

MUSC 3133 Teaching General Music

20

MUSC 4203 Music Methods Practicum

25

EDUC 4112* Educational Psychology for Adolescents

15

MUSC 4323** Differentiating Instruction in K-8 Music Classrooms

25

MUSC 4103 Introduction to Student Teaching50
EDUC 4732 K-12 Student Teaching640
Totals

800+

* EDUC 2411 Educational Psychology for Elementary Schools may be taken in place of EDUC 4112
**EDUC 4023 Differentiating Instruction in Diverse Secondary Classrooms or 5485 Differentiation in the Classroom may be taken in place of MUSC 4323

These tables feature the field-related courses in each teacher licensure program (versus the full course sequence). They summarize the current minimum requirements for each field-linked course in order for students to meet the state-required 800 field hours, including 600 student teaching hours, for initial teacher licensure programs. Students are encouraged to do more than the minimum to improve the quality of their learning in the field experiences and ensure that they have met the minimum by the end of the program.

Course # and NameMin. Hours
EDUC 4320 Reading & EDUC 4321 Writing Instruction for Elementary43

EDUC 4411 Educational Psychology for Elementary Schools

30

EDUC 4351 Language & Equity; EDUC 5205 Math Methods

70

9-Block: EDUC 4331 Social Studies Methods; EDUC 4341 Reading Assessment; EDUC 5215 Science Methods

75

EDUC 4691 Student Teaching – Elementary600
Totals

818+

This licensure program has sunsetted.

Describe your clinical experiences as a teacher candidate and how they impact your work today.

  I’m still pretty close to my mentor teacher and she still mentors me. I would say she was a really big influence on how I teach today, how I continue to grow as a teacher, and how I overcame challenges during student teaching."

—Sadie Caven, Elementary Education Alumnus, '21

Program Impact & Producing Effective Educators

We engage in efforts to regularly monitor, assess, and evaluate the progress of our candidates through multiple measures with the aim of supporting their development as teachers. Faculty, staff, and teacher education leadership regularly and continuously communicate and monitor the progress of candidates throughout our programs to ensure that they are on track for classroom readiness. This is evidenced by our careful alignment of the Colorado Teacher Quality Standards (COTQS) across all the courses within each program, the benchmarks and review process as candidates progress through our programs, care and concern feedback cycles, and growth plan processes.

This past year, the Teacher Education Leadership Team developed a series of guiding questions that we wish to explore as a team to help us dig even further into our program’s impacts and help us develop an even more robust sense of the ways in which we are producing effective educators. These guiding questions include: 

  1. Who are joining our programs, from where, and why are they choosing CU Boulder? 

  2. What do we know about our candidates that are persisting and completing our programs? 

  3. What happens when graduates leave our programs?

  4. Who are we helping to become teachers? Who are we missing, excluding, or losing?

 

From 2014-15 to 2018-19, we had a total of

540 students

completing a teacher licensure at the Undergraduate or Post-Baccalaureate level

Of our undergraduate and Post-BA teacher licensure students from 2014-15 to 2018-19, around

40 % enrolled in a master's

or a professional program after graduation

According to the CDE Educator Preparation Program Report Dashboard, almost

65 % of our teachers placed in-state

in 2018-2019

When asked, "Looking back, would you still enroll in this teacher education program?”, around

85 % of students said yes

in our 2018-2021 Student Teacher Exit Survey data

Using Candidate Performance As Feedback For Program Improvement

Directors and program chairs review and redesign the goals and structures for engaging in robust, continuous program improvement efforts, especially as they relate to the Colorado Teacher Quality Standards, the School of Education’s mission and vision, and our program principles and frameworks. As part of our program redesigns, we have also reviewed our key data sources. Our Teacher Education Leadership Team has identified the following data sources as valuable to our current work across program areas:

  • Student Teaching Evaluations (completed collaboratively by the University Supervisor/Field Coach and mentor teacher)

  • Student Perception Survey (completed by K-12 students for our candidates)

  • Candidate Exit Survey (completed once our candidates graduate)

  • Summative Performance/Capstone Projects (which vary by program area)

  • Induction Survey (completed by graduates after 1 year of teaching)

  • Professionalism tools (completed by mentors and candidates, which vary by program area and type of field experience)

  • Marquee Assignments (completed by candidates and evaluated in relation to mastery of course goals and state/national standards)

 

Challenges and Opportunities

  Financial Barriers

One important and complex challenge is addressing the financial barriers to becoming a teacher. To understand these barriers to better address them, we launched a research project in the fall of 2020 to study the financial barriers of becoming a teacher at CU Boulder. Among other things, the research underscored a range of financial barriers for teacher education students, including:

  • Tuition and living expenses,

  • Expenses related to clinical practice (e.g. transportation to and from student teaching or practicum sites),

  • Expenses related to licensure (e.g. exam fees),

  • Reduced opportunities for paid employment (due to schedule constraints), and

  • Difficulty or lack of knowledge about navigating bureaucracy in order to access resources.

We used that feedback to make program improvements. For example, one program selected start and end dates of field placements so that candidates could maximize weeks before and after the semester to accumulate income for a few extra weeks to cover their expenses. We have also been partnering with colleagues in the Colorado Department of Higher Education (CDHE) to advocate for state funding to support paid student teaching experiences and other financial support that can greatly improve a candidate’s ability to complete their licensure programs. 

The passing of HB 22-1220 is an exciting pathway as a result of this partnership work and is designed to support our candidates facing the greatest financial challenges in persisting through a teacher preparation program. However, because HB 22-1220 is currently designed as a two-year pilot program, it is difficult to leverage this potentially critical program in recruitment efforts to diversify the workforce, as candidates entering our programs won’t benefit unless the program is renewed or made permanent.

  Transportation Challenges

Furthermore, our teacher licensure programs rely on long-term and deep experiences in schools with students from underserved backgrounds that often require students to travel to school districts up to an hour away. This is time-consuming and creates transportation challenges. 

  • We have been working closely with students to adapt and address these challenges. We begin communications with candidates early and often to ensure we understand their transportation needs and consider them when making placements (as discussed in Domain III). We encourage dialogue between candidates for carpooling and reserve our closest placements for candidates that have the greatest transportation or financial needs. 
  • We are also in continual conversation with our school and district partners and remain current on how a school’s student demographics may be changing and foster partnerships with schools serving more racially and socioeconomically diverse student populations. For example, a school in BVSD that traditionally serves monolingual, white and fairly affluent students is now seeing a developing population of emergent bilingual students that are more economically and racially diverse. Understanding these changes and their evolving needs creates the possibility to place candidates there for practicum and student teaching. We imagine that these local partnerships may help alleviate some transportation challenges.

  Sustainable Funding

We continue to struggle to secure enough scholarship funding to attract and retain these future teachers and community leaders. While we award several dozen scholarships to undergraduate students, most of these awards range from $1,000-$5,000.

  • For example, an additional support that the Spanish Department offers is a $1000 scholarship to student teachers during their student teaching semester, made possible by the Elizabeth Brower Fund. This small financial support is especially important for student teachers who have relied on part-time work during their coursework at CU Boulder to meet their financial needs. But with high university tuition and fee costs, these scholarships sometimes do not even cover fees, let alone the cost of attendance.
  • We are collaborating with our donors and Advancement Team to develop scholarships designed to support more teacher candidates in their more advanced clinical experiences, which are typically when candidates have the most financial challenges in their teacher prep program. 
  • Although we seek sustainable funding to support our various efforts, it has been a considerable challenge. For example, the music education faculty have developed a mentoring training program, called the Mentor Plus Training Program, which was funded by an internal seed grant. Led by music faculty, this grant helped provide materials and to incentivize teachers with renewal credits, but has not been continuously funded. 

Did you feel prepared to teach after graduation, and what factors contributed to feeling prepared to teach and lead?

  I’m having an amazing time. I feel very prepared for whatever’s going to come at me. I do want to talk about how I’m able to be so relaxed two weeks into my first teaching job and it has everything to do with the education I got at CU."

—Mikail Kraft, Secondary Spanish Licensure Alumnus, '22

Key Priorities Guiding Our Next Cycle

Through our conversations around program improvement, we have selected four key priorities for our teacher licensure programs to guide our work over the next several years. These are grounded in our School of Education mission, vision, and values. These priorities are in addition to the unique goals that each program has developed. We highlight these goals and some concrete examples of ways we are aiming to take action in relation to these priorities.

 

 

Build enrollment, especially among first-generation, low-income, non-traditional, bilingual, and underrepresented students (Black, Latinx, Asian, Pacific Islander, Indigenous) to better reflect the K-12 students and communities we partner with and support.  

  • Developing additional pathways to engage in our programs, including leveraging our Education Minors pathways into our majors and licensure programs, as well as other feeder programs such as Exploratory Studies, SASC, McNeil, and the Lead Alliance.

  • Building relationships with others on campus, such as Engineering, Environmental Design, and Student Affairs. 

  • Partnering with local school districts and their high school pathways programs where students are already interested in teaching.

 

Strengthen and further integrate school and community partnerships within our programs.

  • We are developing and deepening partnerships with K-12 schools, districts, nonprofits, government, and industry to expand opportunities that are in alignment with our Undergraduate programs and their guiding commitments. 
  • We are working with career services and centers within the School of Education to integrate career development throughout our majors and teacher licensure programs.

 

Increase and stabilize funding.

  • Work with the university, donors, the State of Colorado, and school districts to increase funding opportunities for teacher candidates in intensive field experiences, particularly student teaching, to make the rigorous coursework and fieldwork accessible to a wider body of students. This could include funding from scholarships, paid student teaching opportunities and the like. This also makes traveling to communities that are farther away more financially feasible.

 

Evaluating and revising our programs to be more accessible and equitable.

  • We are revising agreements with community colleges to make it smoother and more feasible for transfer students to join our programs. 
  • The Elementary Education program is working towards increasing flexibility in course offerings, such as summer courses and taking courses at flexible times. This allows students more opportunities to study abroad, obtain a minor in another department, and facilitate the transition for students transferring from community colleges.

Thank you!

Thank you to our colleagues in the CDE and CDHE, the CCODE Reauthorization Subcommittee, the Site Review Team, and all the people who read and review our document submissions. We are grateful for your time and dedication in developing a revised reauthorization process and providing feedback to our institution as we continue to learn and grow as a Teacher Education community. 

Link to CU Boulder Reauthorization Self-Study Report